patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

City May Rein in Pension Costs

New contracts for city workers are on the agenda at tonight's San Juan Capistrano City Council meeting.

 

EDITOR'S NOTE: Slight corrections to management pay increases, the current retirement formula (2.7 at 55) and the date by which all employees will be covering their own costs of retirement (July 1, 2013, not Jan. 1, 2013).

City employees would get raises but also start paying their full share of retirement costs under new contracts coming before San Juan Capistrano's City Council on Tuesday.

Overall, the proposed contracts would cost the city $81,005 for the three-year term. But the city expects longer-term savings on retirement costs, according to a staff report. 

City employees in two bargaining units have been operating without contracts since June. Negotiations began in November, the staff report says.

Across California and the nation, public pension plans call for contributions from both government employers and employees, but most government agencies pay all or part of the employee share, which has been the case in San Juan.

Now, San Juan wants new employees, retroactively effective to Jan. 1, to pay their own share. Meanwhile, existing employees would start paying half of their portion on July 1. Then, starting July 1, 2013, all employees would pay the full amount of the employee contribution.

“These are pension reform measures that will contain the city’s long-term pension obligations,” the staff report says. “All employees, including San Juan Capistrano Management and Professional Employees Association, Classified Employees Association and executive employees, will soon be paying their full share of retirement costs.”

The staff report estimates the city’s payroll-related costs will be cut by about 5-6 percent. However, as part of the proposed contracts, workers would get raises. Classified employees would get a 3 percent raise effective July 1, and another 3 percent in July 2013; management would get 1 percent effective retroactively to Jan. 1, 3 percent on July 1 and then 3 percent on July 1,  2013; and executive employees would receive 2 percent this July and another 2 percent July 2013.

The proposed contracts feature some other changes, including:

  • Benefits – Empoyees won’t get cash back for selecting lower cost medical insurance plans and would be capped out at $5,000 for tuition reimbursements.
  • Leaves – Beginning July 1, floating holiday leave would increase from 10 to 20 hours a year and classified employees’ vacation time would max out at 340 hours, up from 300 hours.
  • City Hall closures – City Hall would close and most employees would have an unpaid leave between Christmas Eve and New Year’s Day; however, employees may use accrued leave to cover them.

Retirement formulas would change. Employees hired after July 1 would work longer to earn their pension.

Currently, the formula is 2.7 percent at age 55, multiplied by the years of service to provide a percentage of final compensation earned at retirement. So workers with 30 years of service credit could be eligible for up to 60 percent of final compensation if retiring at age 55.

Under the new contracts, staffers would be looking at a new formula of 2 percent at age 57 for new employees.

According to the latest data tracked by the state's controller's office, San Juan taxpayers paid as much as $10,076 and as little as $346 per employee for the employees' share of pension contributions in 2009.

In other City Council business, council members are expected to:

  • Honor Orange County Sheriff's Deputy Kasey Marshall as deputy of the year
  • Discuss options for the now-vacant Williams/Swanner house, now that a family is no longer leasing it as a residence
  • Extend the grace period for residents to pay their water bills from 10 days to 15 before charging an 8 percent late fee
  • Start a process to amend a zoning law so certain retail and food uses could be allowed in business buildings designated as "low-density office" in the Los Rios Street Historic District. Only one building, the Las Hadas building at Del Obispo Street near Paseo Adelanto, has been labeled low-density office in that area and the owners would like more flexibility in attracting new tenants.
Related Topics: Pensions, Public Employee Benefits, San Juan Capistrano City Council, pension costs, public employee pensions, and public employee retirement

Kim

8:01 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Wow, what a difference a good City manager can make....we can only count our blessings that Joe Tait and Steven Apple are gone, all unfortunately fostered by then Mayor Nielsen. However, the damage they did will sadly live on and the residents will end up paying the tab for years to come.

Reply

William Brighton

2:40 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Good to see consistency out of dementia-riddled Kim. So sad to have to read. Nielsen, Apple and Tait inherited ALL city plans, policies and procedures from Dave Adams and Cindy Russell. It is those plans that are now being changed. Stretch your demented brain Kim and try to think about one question - Who do you think benefited the most out of the current pensions? I know, you give up. The correct answer is those who AUTHORED it! Nielsen and Tait received no pension benefits. Check yourself speedy.

Reply

Kim

6:36 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Get your facts straight William, or you really be Mark Nielsen......all Tait inherited was a lot of City money in salary form which was so over the top and (you) Nielsen supported it all. BTW, where is this fabulous guy now,and what is he earning?Go figure, and are you saying Karen Brust makes an ourtrageous salary? Hardly compared to Tait, plus she has SJC in her heart, not her bank account. .Nielsens cohorts also benified... but ran when the heat got a bit too high, weisels! Your comments towards me are personal and rude... you must be very up-set with the way things are now going, out of you and yours control! Personally, I love that you are so bothered by the changes, as they must be in the right direction for the City and those of us who love living here.

Reply

Joel Peshkin

8:28 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

The problem goes a lot farther than who pays the "employee portion" of the pension costs. The amount of pension needed to keep paying the benefits promised go far beyond what the "city portion" and "employee portion" are together. Unfortunately, the question of how much a pension earned today will actually cost seems to be close to un-knowable.

Reply

JessC

7:43 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Reform for our City's pension, as well as across the Nation, is long overdue. Thank you Karen for leading the charge to do something about our City's pension system. However, I still have a problem with this automatic raise increase mentality. In the real world, raises are rewarded for a job well done, and if the budget allows for the increase. In the case of our City's staff, some of them have not earned their present salary, let alone any future increases. Also, we don't have the money to keep lining their pockets!

Reply

Kim

7:50 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

You are so right JessC...fiscal responsibility is the key for success, and it starts at the City level. Many thanks for people like you and Karen who truly understand the issue.

Reply

JessC

2:42 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

I have to hand it to Karen for being able to do what she does. The poor woman is surrounded by highly compensated incompetent staff. Along with Cindy Russell as mentioned by Mr. Brighton above, she has the likes of Grant Taylor and Nasser who consistently screw things up. The latest debacle with the San Juan Creek road project, under the direction of Nasser, was revealed at last evening's council meeting by two local residents. Nasser needs to go and he needs to take a few others along with him. I am tired of paying for stupidity!

Reply

Kim

7:55 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

Does Mr. Brighton think Nielsen should receive a pension benefit for being on the City Council as stated above in his last sentence. Who has dementia, you better look into the mirror!

Reply

Leave a comment