patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

San Juan Parents Lobby for Tax Extensions, Education Spending

They say Sen. Tom Harman should vote for an extension of state taxes set to expire June 30 that would give schools more money.

 

They've watched Capistrano Unified issue pink slips to hundreds of teachers and increase their children's class sizes. Fearing that the cutbacks  will escalate, about 30 San Juan Capistrano parents organized Wednesday to lobby state Sen. Tom Harman to take a stand against any further cuts to education.

Putting "more kids in each classroom makes it harder on the teachers," said Karla Cedillo, a mother of three. She used her cell phone to participate  in the phone bank and letter-writing campaign near Stonefield Park.

With the help of CREER Comunidad y Familia and the Orange County Congregation Community Organization, the parents—mostly moms—and some Capistrano Unified School District students phoned San Juan residents, urging them to contact Harman's office in support of extending state tax extensions set to expire June 30. The money, they say, should be used to fully fund schools.

Harman, a Republican who represents communities along Orange County's coastline, has yet to publicly take a stance on the tax extensions, said OCCCO Executive Director Debbie Phares. "He has indicted a willingness to negotiate," she said.

Similar movements are happening across California. On May 24, Educate Our State organized rallies in numerous cities, many of them in Southern California, where parents pushed for the tax extension bill. The bill is attracting support from teacher unions, school districts and the California PTA.

OCCCO spokeswoman Aura Vasquez said the response from those who answered calls Wednesday afternoon was "very positive."

"This is a universal issue. CREER is often the target of a lot of controversy, but everyone is on the same page," she said, knocking on a wood desk.

For years, the Legislature has slashed California's education budget to balance massive shortfalls in the general fund. Dependent on the limited state funds, the Capistrano Unified board of trustees responded by cutting $91 million in the past six years.

Gov. Jerry Brown's May budget proposal calls for $3 billion more funds for schools than his January pitch. He said, though, that even with this new infusion of money, California schools are still owed billions by the state.

San Juan Capistrano resident Rosa Maria Melo, a mother of three, said Wednesday that while she recognizes a tax extension will hurt those still struggling in the economy—her family included—her children are her main priority.

“It is our calling to protect the earth we were given for our children and to protect and educate our children," she said. "But these imperatives will be made impossible if Sen. Harman stands by while another $10 billion in cuts are made to schools, children’s health care and protection of our natural resources.”

Melo initiated the phone bank and letter-writing campaign in San Juan Capistrano. She said she was inspired to do so after attending an OCCCO conference in May in Santa Ana, where she learned about the state's financial crisis and its impact on education.

"This is the first time these moms have gotten involved in something like this," said Vasquez. "Even the most humble people who have never been involved in civic action are here."

Reality Check

6:37 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011

It may be time to replace GOP leadership in Orange County that does not respond to or support the needs of a growing segment of society: public school families. Harman represents school districts whose continued success depend on her support. The future of Orange County property owners, students, employers, and school workers all depend on his responsible leadership. Now is the time of judgment.

Reply

SJC Leo

8:36 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011

No, no, no. No tax extensions, no new taxes. When our legislature approves outlandish pay packages like the one that the prision union just got, considers giving illegal aliens in state tuition, and gives billions to illegal alien families, there is no justification for me to pay more in taxes. Enough already.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shripathi Kamath

3:34 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

It seems you are happy with more children in each CUSD classroom and fewer teachers because the prison guards got a "outlandish pay package" (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/04/22/MN0H1J3TMU.DTL), and because Congress will not change immigration policy, despite enjoying the lowest tax burden Americans have, in the last 60 years.

OK

Comment_arrow

SJC Leo

3:49 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

Ok, Mr. Kamath. I'll try this again. There is plenty of OUR money in Sacramento. The problem in California is the gross mismanagement of taxpayer money by our legislature. The plan to offer illegal aliens in state tuition has nothing to do with the United States congress. Also, why does it cost California three times more to house an inmate than it does in Texas? These are just two of countless examples of wasteful spending and attempts to social engineer the citizens of this state.

Comment_arrow

Shripathi Kamath

6:05 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

Try it again, then. Why does Texas have a bigger deficit than California?

(http://www.businessinsider.com/texas-budget-shortfall-2011-1)

Why is it that you ignore the fact that 52% of our budget is Education? Or that you completely ignored what I said about the "outlandish pay package", and disassociate "gives billions to illegal alien families" with Congressional (non)initiatives on immigration, and introduce new non-starters?

melissa kaffen

8:45 am on Friday, June 3, 2011

(Interesting pic to go with the propaganda) So I'm supposed to pay all my spiraling taxes & expenses along with paying for a tidal wave of "anchor -baby public school students" in need of MORE TEACHERS AND SMALLER CLASSES. Will someone please tell me if I have a bulls-eye on my back. ///????

Home school NOW it's our only HOPE!

(George & Ariana must be so proud Jenna)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shripathi Kamath

3:26 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

Ironically, yours is a good argument *against* home schooling.

Comment_arrow

SJC Leo

3:52 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

Mr. Kamath, I didn't home school my children when they were school age, but I've seen several studies that show home schooled children are at least as well prepared as those who went to public schools. In most cases, they are better prepared. So why the cheap shot against Ms. Kaffen for her desire to home school her children?

Comment_arrow

shelly

4:00 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

melissa kaffin,
What is wrong with the picture? Why is showing involved parents interesting? Isn't that what the story is about? Can you explain your comment?

Comment_arrow

Shripathi Kamath

5:59 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

Cheap shot? I was serious.

She's her facts wrong on spiraling taxes (tax burden today is the lowest in 60 years), and if expenses are spiraling, they are spiraling for those teachers too. She calls the news article a propaganda, and shifts the blame of Congress doing nothing on immigration to the ones who want to solve the problem by the one means they know how.

And if her taxes and expenses are spiraling, she'll need a second or a third job further disqualifying her from being able to home-school.

If she home-schooled kids, we'd be in deeper trouble.

Also, I did not say anything derogatory about home-schooling, I simply pointed out that hers is not an argument for it.

Capo mom

6:26 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

I am curious where the photo came from;

a classroom or an office of an advocacy group?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Jenna Chandler

8:08 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

The photo was taken from inside the CREER offices near Stonefield Park, where the parents held the phone bank and letter writing campaign

Capo Parent

10:39 am on Monday, June 6, 2011

Throwing more money at education only means more money for the state to waste. Examples, Prop. 98 and lottery money.

Reply

shelly

4:14 pm on Monday, June 6, 2011

Capo Parent,
Nobody is throwing more money at education. Education funding has been reduced all over the country because of the economy. If we want smaller class sizes and to save programs at our children's schools then it will take money. Right?

Reply

Capo Parent

5:30 pm on Monday, June 6, 2011

Even you will have to admit that expending over $50 billion a year on education in CA is an enormous sum of money. In fact, it is large than the GDP of a number of countries throughout the world. Given how much money is allocated to education in CA and based on the article, "Capo Spends Less Per Student, Earns Higher API Score" the answer to your quetion is no.

Reply

shelly

10:38 pm on Monday, June 6, 2011

Capo Parent,
Our children are our most valuable resource. They are the future. I think that investing in them is worth it. Education funding has been cut. How do you know that spending the same amount or more will not result in better results . This article cannot prove one way or the other because it does not compare districts demographically but only by population. You do not believe that smaller class sizes and saving programs such as afterschool help for kids will not help?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Capo Parent

8:20 am on Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Our most valuable resource is time, think about it. As for education funding, the state has played games with it for years, e.g. deferrals. The problem isn't the funding, its getting as much of the allocated funding as possible into the classroom. While I think smaller class sizes are great and make sense, others, including Trustee Lynn Hatton, don't feel the same way. FYI, the contract with the teachers' union that has been at issue was actually structured to minimize increases in class sizes. It seems class size is important up to the point it affects the compensation package of the teachers' union. Once that occurs then you have people like Hatton who claim that studies show that class sizes do not affect test scores.

Comment_arrow

shelly

4:59 pm on Tuesday, June 7, 2011

What good is time if the quality of it is not good. Quality of time or quantity of time? What good will time be if the quality of it is no good?

My children to me are precious. I would give up my time for my children to have more time.

Education funding has been cut. It costs money to provide smaller class sizes so you either have to pay more or increase class sizes if more money is not provided.

Capo Parent

8:16 am on Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Because without time, you don't have any "time" to change bad time to quality time. Glad you're willing to give up your time for more time for you kids, but unless your kids are at an age they are self-sufficient, you are being short-sighted.

Several billion dollars for education has been "deferred" by the politicians. Further, over $50 billion a year is spent on education in CA. Funding is not the problem. Receipt of the funds and how they are spent are the problems. Your rationale is the rationale that leads to every increasing taxes at a time when most families are struggling to survive.

Reply

shelly

7:55 am on Thursday, June 9, 2011

Capo Parent,
Time is a valuable resource. We choose quantity of time over quality of time all of the time. Our most valuable resource along with time as a country and a world is our children. They are the ones who will figure out how to change the bad times to quality times.

Was the budget cut last year and this year or not? Were teachers laid off this year and last year or not? Were class sizes raised and programs cut this year and last year or not? What would you rather spend the money on?

If you and others do not want their education taxes to go to politicians then have a local tax that goes directly to the school district. There is less money and things are more expensive for all of us but our children should be a priority.

Why am I being short-sighted if I, as a parent, am willing to give up my time so that my kids have more time? Isn't that what we are supposed to do as parents?

Reply

Capo Parent

11:07 am on Thursday, June 9, 2011

Of course, we can fix everything with another tax, this time a "local" tax. Education, like most tax payers, needs to live within its means. If $50 billion a year is not enough, than Education needs to be dramtically reformed.

From a logical standpoint, you giving up time in the belief your kids get more time is an illogical statement. You can't transfer time from yourself to your kids. Time is not an item or commodity that can be traded, transfered or passed on. Your time is your time, period.

Reply

shelly

9:14 pm on Thursday, June 9, 2011

Capo parent,
If I choose to spend my time making sure my kids are well fed, get exercise and get a good education than I am providing them with the opportunity to have more quality time and maybe just more time because they will make good choices so they live longer and also be better equipped to change bad time to good time. My time is my time but right now I choose to use it to raise my children.

Everything costs more these days. Technology costs more and must constantly be replaced, gas costs more, utilities cost more, food costs more, even used cars cost more, and because everything costs more education costs more. Do you think that prices don't increase over the years.

Education funding has been reduced.

Again, I will ask the following. Was the budget cut last year and this year or not? Were teachers laid off this year and last year or not? Were teachers salaries cut last year? Were class sizes raised and programs cut this year and last year or not? What would you rather spend the money on?

Reply

southcounty

10:21 pm on Thursday, June 9, 2011

NO NEW TAXES! We can barely afford to live here as it is. We are already one of the most heavily taxed states in the nation.

I'll bet that many of the people lobbying for higher taxes don't even pay taxes.

This tax grubbing is OUTRAGEOUS and needs to STOP. All it serves to do is drive employers out of state.

Reply

southcounty

10:24 pm on Thursday, June 9, 2011

By the way - I agree with melissa kaffen. It's time to introduce competition in education through choices; home schooling, vouchers, charter schools - as long as we can get out from under the budget-busting unions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

shelly

11:17 pm on Saturday, June 11, 2011

I support the choice of home schooling and charters but I do not support vouchers becasue I do not want my taxes to support private schools that can exclude kids based on ability, race, religion, sex, family income, etc.

The union didn't bust the budget the banks and businesses who brought down the economy
did. The people who are in unions who are teachers, fire -fighters, peace-officers, etc. support our economy by being responsible tax paying citizens who buy homes, buy goods and services which help to support our economy. So if you bust all the unions and decrease everyone's pay then you decrease millions of people's buying power. Because people will not be able to afford to buy goods and services or houses our economy will continue to sputter and falter. But I guess somebody somewhere will be making a profit and that is all that matters to some.

Leave a comment