.

MOVIE REVIEW: The Hobbit

The first third of Peter Jackson's epic proves merely satisfactory.

What to say about The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (using its full title)?

Three hours is a very long time, and I shall confess from the outset I am among the handful of creatures on this level of Earth who was not entranced by the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. Now you know the awful truth. 

Yet, much to my infinite surprise, I more than survived the running time of Peter Jackson’s newest, already worldwide blockbuster release, and perhaps, owing to my initial trepidation, actually had fun and was wowed many times by the sheer visual splendor of it all. 

I did not see the 3D or IMAX or other super-duper versions offered to filmgoers. Plain old 2D was good enough for me. Much was been written (too much for my taste) regarding the traditional 24 frames per second format (my choice), but I had no problems with the technology on screen. 

  • The Hobbit is playing in the Regency's in 2D at 11:45  a.m., 3:10 p.m., 6:45 p.m. amd 10:20 p.m. It's also playing in 3D at 11:30 a.m., 3 p.m., 6:30 p.m. and 10 p.m.

Resplendent scenes of verdant fields, waterfalls, caves, chutes, assorted avian creatures flittering about all were feasts for the jaded eye after the Rings trilogy onslaught of already almost a decade ago.

The Hobbit as a novel predates the Rings trilogy but introduces us to its protagonist Bilbo Baggins (the wonderful Martin Freeman) and sets up the landscape that is now familiar terrain for devotees of this and the later Tolkien novels. 

My major quibble (echoed by countless other critics before and since the release of the current film) is that Jackson’s ego and bank account have become swollen with dreams of another financial windfall. Whereas Lord of the Rings justified its three-film marathon running time, Hobbit is one 300-page novel that could easily be condensed into a film of reasonable length, not deserving of the two additional ones to come.

Far before the second hour, one gets the point: The endless uproarious feasting and drinking, the comraderie of the dwarfs going to battle the dragon, the jauntiness juxtaposed with the sagacity of Gandalf — here again the estimable Ian McKellan — become tiresome and repetitive. 

Only the role of Gollum, performed to perfection by a CGI-enhanced Andy Serkis, stands out as a marvel of controlled excess. 

The Frodo of Elijah Wood remains charming. In his little round hut, he expertly hosts a crew of assorted, comically bearded dwarves at a bacchanal buffet where they drink and carbo-load, preparing themselves for the noble, glorious battles to come.  

Given that The Hobbit is properly a prequel to the already released LOTR, there is sadly, not much new here that was not served with much more innovation and wonder in that trilogy.

Tolkien fans will no doubt rejoice at once again having total immersion in the world of magic and fantasy that is Middle-earth. With “our” world on the precipice of destruction (according to the Mayans), I suggest you go post-haste to your nearest theatre to catch this while you can. 

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »