.
Feedback

Did You Get a Massage From This Man?

A massage therapist at Massage Envy will serve one year in jail for assaulting three clients.

A massage therapist pleaded guilty Friday to sexually assaulting three of his clients while performing massages in Seal Beach. During the investigation, he continued to provide massages in Mission Viejo.

Jason Michael Elliott, 29, of Sunset Beach, pleaded guilty to one felony count of sexual battery and two misdemeanor counts of sexual battery, according to Deputy District Attorney Vanessa Woods.  He was immediately sentenced to a year in jail.

Elliott also will be put on three years of formal probation, will have to register as a sex offender and is barred from contacting the victims, Woods said. Elliott went into custody today, she added.

Three felony counts of assault with intent to commit a sex offense were dismissed, according to court records. From Aug. 4, 2009, to April 29, 2010, Elliott worked as a masseur at a Seal Beach Massage Envy location at 12340 Seal Beach Blvd., where he sexually assaulted the three women, according to prosecutors.  

Elliott assaulted a 30-year-old woman at the business for a spa treatment on Sept. 30, 2009; a 33-year-old woman who came in for a massage Nov.8, 2009; and a 21-year-old woman who paid for a massage April 29, 2010, according to prosecutors.  

The 33-year-old woman called Seal Beach police the same day, prosecutors said. As detectives investigated, they found two more victims. Elliott was fired when his bosses found about the allegations.

But despite the investigation, Elliott continued to work as a masseur in Mission Viejo and other parts of Orange County. As of July of last year, Elliott was no longer certified as a massage therapist by the California Massage Therapy Council, according to prosecutors.

Elliott isn’t Orange County’s only Massage Envy masseuse to be accused of sexual assault in the last year. Earlier, two women accused Mark Pergil Valenzon, a masseuse at the Laguna Beach location, of masturbating and pressing up against them during a massage. The women in that case are also suing the salon, alleging the company covered up "knowledge that Valenzon was a threat to his female clients."

Massage Envy has also been named in other lawsuits involving rape and sexual assault in Tustin, Maryland, Texas, Utah and Kansas City.

— City News Service Contributed to this report.

Justin October 21, 2012 at 12:49 pm
a masseuse is a term for a woman
Penny Arévalo (Editor) October 21, 2012 at 01:14 pm
Really? You learn something new every day. Thanks!
Dan October 21, 2012 at 11:00 pm
So, Justine, what is the term for a man that performs massages?
Penny Arévalo (Editor) October 21, 2012 at 11:51 pm
Masseur, I put it in the story. :-)
Lorna October 23, 2012 at 01:46 pm
OK, here is another Educating moment, if a person is a true Therapeutic Body Worker, the correct term is Massage Therapist. Masseur and Masseuse is referring to people who give extra services that are not Therapeutic and not considered part of the scope of practice for a Massage Therapist in the Healthcare Profession.
It would be great if the Media was correctly educated and used correct terms. The other Term used incorrectly is Parlor, that is where career Masseur and Masseuses work. The correct term for Professional establishments where Massage Therapists work is Clinic. The individuals who get through the schooling and receive a Professional Massage Therapy License, then abuse it by using sexual conduct, are the people who keep the True Purpose and benefits of Professional Massage Therapy out of the lime light. Which in turn gives Professional Massage establishments or Therapeutic Clinics (like Massage Envy) a bad name.
Penny Arévalo (Editor) October 23, 2012 at 01:56 pm
Thank you, Lorna, that was very interesting. I didn't write the story, but I sure learned a lot from our readers. :-)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Juan Capistrano Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lawrene Bottorf June 15, 2013 at 03:57 pm
Bummer...
Clint Worthington June 16, 2013 at 03:44 pm
You have a right to live in peace in your home. I would not put up with that.
rob h June 13, 2013 at 07:11 am
Wonder how many people even understood the first COEXIST sticker, let alone this one
Lynn Monaghan June 14, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Paige, I'm confused too. Just imagine how the Statue of Liberty/ Mother of Exiles must feel aboutRead More being on the sticker. Caring for our tired and poor immigrants, our tempest-tossed and huddled masses yearning to breathe free, doesn't seem to be a top priority for capitalists, after all. Maybe she should be replaced with someone else who could look like an "i"... maybe Joe the Plumber with an outstretched arm holding a plunger?
Status Quo June 16, 2013 at 04:57 pm
Easily as laughable as the mixed message of the effrontery of the coexist sticker... the simplestRead More explanation may be the truth.
John Egan June 13, 2013 at 08:31 pm
To Cox Cable: Make sure Trumbo signs where the customer wants him to sign... Just came back fromRead More Pechanga where Mark was signing and he was signing baseballs with sharpies; not signing on the sweet spot, putting ASTERISKS (!?) after his name on jerseys; and signing helmets on the back, behind the ear flap... Don't take expensive items down there...
Clint Worthington June 13, 2013 at 08:50 am
The City approved the plans for Del Taco many years ago. What they did not approve was the changeRead More in the color to the tiles and the change in color to the outside of the building. Those are changes to the original plans submitted by Del Taco. As the Design Review Committee pointed out, these changes are not acceptable. The City does have strict requirements regarding signs and architecture.