Local Activist Apologizes for Election Mailers

Local activist Charles Mann apologizes for false claims made by his political action committee set up to attack City Council candidates three days after the candidates lost the election.

A local activist who sent mailers attacking two city council candidates during the election apologized to the San Clemente Chamber of Commerce Friday for false statements contained in them.

Charles Mann’s political action committee sent out mailers in October attacking two candidates and their ties to the chamber. Today, three days after the candidates were defeated in the election, Mann issued an official apology for the misleading mailers.

The Chamber demanded an apology Monday from Charles Mann's political action committee set up to attack two city council candidates.

"I hereby acknowledge that the statements regarding the San Clemente Chamber of Commerce in two political advertisements that Watchdog distributed are false," Mann said in a letter to the Chamber. "I apologize to the Chamber, its members and its directors for any suggestion that anyone associated with the Chamber had engaged in any misconduct."

The PAC, called Watchdog for San Clemente Responsible Government -- a Committee Formed to Oppose Jim Dahl and Mike Mortenson for City Council 2012, attacked. Jim Dahl and Mike Mortenson. Ultimately, both candidates lost the election.

The Chamber accused Mann and his wife Jeri Mann's PAC of deliberately accusing the organization of illegal activity in two mailers sent out last week.

"PAC spent $4,000 on [Mortenson's] campaign. SC Taxpayers funded it," reads one of the mailers.

"By stating that 'SC Taxpayers funded it,' Defendants... knowingly and intentionally accused the Chamber of engaging in criminal activity, which Defendants know is not true," reads the draft lawsuit, which attorneys threatened to file if the Manns didn't release an immediate statement apologizing to the chamber and recanting the accusations in the mailers.

"Moreover, when Defendants allege that the Chamber has engaged in criminal activities, Defendants also, at least implicitly, allege that the Chamber's board members, and their associated businesses, are at least complicit with this conduct. Defendants know this is not true, but simply do not care," the lawsuit states.

The mailers also state Jim Dahl voted to give the chamber $400,000 from the city and that the Chamber-associated PAC spent $23,000 on his campaign.

"That's a kickback," reads the letter. 

The Chamber’s draft lawsuit calls this another example of defamation. The city contracts with the organization for printed materials and certain services, and the Chamber-associated PAC is funded by private donations from its members, not tax money.

"This lie that any public funds went to the Chamber's PAC is even more troubling because at no time has any public funds been given to the PAC," the suit states. "Defendants just made this up, once again, to advance their own political agenda, regardless of the harm it has caused the Chamber."

Moonshine November 11, 2012 at 05:14 AM
I'm talking about the "Watchdog" PAC. Why don't you get some quotes on how much a mailer to 20,000 residents costs. Then multiply that by 8. After that, post that number here.
Moonshine November 11, 2012 at 06:26 AM
Larry, I'm concluding nothing other than Charles Mann lied in his mailers and that he now admits it. Tom Barnes' attempt to suggest statements regarding Baker's vote against the handicap bathroom at Courtney's Sandcastle, which Baker admitted and reasoned, is laughable. So is your attempt to deflect the point of not only this article under which you're commenting but my comment. Yes or no, Larry, Charles Mann lied? Character counts. But doesn't always win.
Moonshine November 11, 2012 at 06:30 AM
By the way, I must say that I think it's admirable that Charles Mann owned up to his lies. There are simply too many people in this world who deceive others and never own up to it. For example, people who own low income housing units, and who are slumlords or those that lease the same supposedly low income units out for more than they're permitted to, such that they earn more than they're entitled. Character counts.
Larry Corwin November 11, 2012 at 05:30 PM
In the end the message the voting public had to decide was, Do we elect candidates that prefer maintaining a village atmosphere in San Clemente or do we prefer candidates that appear to favor looking at larger development projects from the perspective of the developer. This in my opinion was what the election was squarely about and the results speak for themselves.
Adam Townsend November 12, 2012 at 02:12 PM
This is a comment from a reader who goes by the handle "Prince" who had a glitch that caused his comment not to post properly. He emailed it to me: Shameful yes, but more like criminal to me... Many of us knew this was a lie early on, yet we hear nothing (then or now) from the two winners. "Watchdog for S. C. responsible government?" You must be joking. If I were a judge, PAC officers would be prosecuted, a new election would be held, and the winners would be disqualified for for NOT standing up for responsible government. If an apology only wins the day, then the local folks are again stuck with what lies have wrought. PS - Believe you gave Mann a softball headline today: "Local Activist Apologizes for Election Mailers." I thought he apologized for LYING? After all, he didn't use the wrong stamp on his mailers.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »