CUSD Students to Meet a National Standard

K-12 students in most states will follow common academic standards aimed to improve college and career readiness. Capo Unified included.

Students in the  will transition to new benchmarks in the next few years, now that the trustees have adopted national educational standards.

Called the "Common Core State Standards," or just Common Core, they're the newest and biggest educational effort since No Child Left Behind. California is one of 45 states nationwide to adopt the standards, which focus on college and career readiness.

In August 2010, the California Board of Education adopted the Common Core, which means that California’s K-12 students will now follow the same academic expectations as children in most other states. Capo Unified made its move in May.

While heavily backed by a variety of groups, the nationalized standards also have their detractors.

The development of the Common Core was a voluntary, state-led effort coordinated by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, with interested groups, such as teachers and parents from nearly every state, contributing to their development. It’s been up to each state to decide whether or not to implement them.

The Common Core includes college and career-readiness standards for mathematics, English-language arts and literacy in various content areas for K-12 students. New assessments, which students begin to take in 2015 when the standars are fully implemented, will rely more on writing, critical thinking, analysis and problem solving. Students can expect to see:

  • More project-based learning
  • Fewer multiple-choice tests
  • More open-ended questions on schoolwork
  • A greater emphasis on informational texts and nonfiction

According to a CUSD presentation district administrators gave at a May 23 Board of Trustees meeting, by 2018, a high school diploma won’t be enough for graduates to find jobs; the labor market will dictate that 63 percent of all United States jobs will require college. Currently, not enough American students graduate college to compete in the global economy.

Employers want workers with effective critical thinking, problem-solving and communication skills, and they want workers to be more creative and collaborative, according to the CUSD presentation. The new standards were designed “with the end in mind,” to foster more of an application of skills instead of encouraging students to memorize facts.

For language arts, the standards require increasing levels of complexity for reading comprehension. In writing, students will need to be able to write a logical argument beginning in the early grades. The arguments must contain reasoning, evidence and claims that have substance.

Math standards for K-5 students will emphasize a solid foundation which will help students grasp more complicated forms of math taught later. Middle school students are prepped for high school math, and high school students have to apply mathematical ways of thinking to real-world issues.

Supporters include the College Board, the American Council on Education, the National Education Association, the national PTA, the American Federation of Teachers and other educational and business groups nationwide.

“Geographic or socio-economic factors should not dictate the level of education that all students are entitled to receive," former National PTA President Charles J. Saylors announced when the standards were first released. "The great benefit of the standards is that they will ensure a level playing field among states, school districts and schools that will give all students the opportunity to be ready for their college and career.”

Throughout the transition period, CUSD will develop resources for teachers as they redesign instruction and assessments to align with the new standards. The district also will work to educate families about the Common Core, said CUSD Trustee Anna Bryson.

Bryson voted for the new standards with some slight reservations, a move that perhaps didn't thrill on the homefront: Her husband and former assistant secretary of education Bill Evers is one of the leading opponents of the Common Core.

Bryson voiced her concerns to the board about the need to hold up CUSD’s and the state’s high math and English standards.

“My concern is intense about making sure that we do not level and lose the great strides we made in math,” Bryson told Patch.

Bryson is confident, however, that CUSD’s leaders will implement the Common Core in a careful way that assures the students will benefit.

“We will find a way to make sure that this means better things for the children through a very rigorous implementation methodology,” Bryson said at the May 23 board meeting.

The Obama administration supports the effort and has included adoption of the Common Core as a requirement to win Race to the Top school reform grants. The federal government didn’t develop the standards but can support states as they implement the national standards.

For example, the federal government can provide states with greater flexibility in their use of federal funds and provide long-term financial support for the development and implementation of common assessments, among other things.

This level of federal involvement has alarmed some critics, who say the Obama administration should not be using Race to the Top to push states into adopting standards and assessments that are substantially the same in most states. Critics say current law bans federal agencies from directing, supervising or controlling elementary and secondary school curriculum, programs of instruction and instructional materials.

Critics also decry what they say is a one-size-fits-all, centrally controlled curriculum for every K-12 subject. They say the Common Core threatens to stifle educational innovation and undermines local control of public school curriculum and instruction.

Ken Lopez Maddox July 03, 2012 at 02:40 PM
Our schools could really use more vocational education.
cusd mom July 03, 2012 at 03:45 PM
I totally agree. I have a child in high school who is not on the four-year college degree track. With all the emphasis on the A-G requirements, there does not seem to be much guidance from our high schools if you are not on this route. Given the rising cost of attending a four-year university and the staggering amount of student loan debt, we need to give our kids other options. There are many successful people in this world with an associates degree or other technical training.
Shripathi Kamath July 03, 2012 at 05:52 PM
Plumbers, electricians, auto repairers and those who maintain pools will always have employment, but it is capped. There are only so many houses with blocked pipes, so many cars, and as technology advances, the needs of a larger labor force in these fields is somewhat obviated. Vocational training does not allow our kids to compete globally, and the modern economy is global. There is a reason why companies outsource -- better prices. So if we de-focus on being at the forefront of technology in the slightest, we'll lose. Our kids will be limited to competing locally, and there are not that many jobs. Trade schools can easily prepare someone to be an electrician, after high school, but while you are in high school would it not give kids a better chance at being prepared to take on the demands of college for a career in advanced technologies? Two-thirds of all jobs in the very near future will require a college degree, so the competition for the remaining one-thirds will also be rather stiff. It is a valid argument that colleges are getting more expensive, that student loans can be crushing, but then shouldn't the focus be on solving that problem, like making colleges more affordable for more of our kids, rather than finding ways to cope with that? I'd rather be a doctor with a 250K student loan, than say a nurse with little or no debt. Both are in the same profession, each will tell you they work REALLY hard, and have the same dignity of labor.
Teacher July 03, 2012 at 06:29 PM
NCLB, and now the Common Core Standards, were originally developed to ensure that our POOREST performing students were achieving a minimum level of proficiency. The standards were never meant to be "the end all" for all, or even most, of our students. The standards were designed to help close the achievement gap. Now? Now we have a system where teachers overly emphasize these concepts in an attempt to put up high scores. For our best and brightest, the standards driven focus has been a disaster. Our best and brightest have to endure the constant reviewing of old material as teachers try to pull along the lower achieving students. Our best and brightest are NOT being served by this approach and we need to re-think this program. I absolutely get that for too long teachers had too much autonomy in the classroom and did whatever they did. Now, I like that teachers feet are "held to the fire" as we measure our students progress. But, if the path we are on continues, we will have a generation where everyone is "proficient" and none are exceptional.
Alberto Barrera July 03, 2012 at 06:38 PM
Education inflation at work. Don't they realize that Calfornia's General Plan still states that only 12.5 percent of the population will attend institutions of higher education?
cusd mom July 03, 2012 at 06:59 PM
When they say 2/3 of all jobs will require a college degree, they don't mean just a 4-year or higher. They are including 2 year associates degrees in that percentage. There are many high tech positions that only require going to community college. Please realize also that not everyone has the ability to be a doctor or an engineer.
Shripathi Kamath July 03, 2012 at 07:29 PM
I am not opposing any form of college, merely pointing out that high schools need not focus on vocational training, they do not need the prep that colleges need. "Please realize also that not everyone has the ability to be a doctor or an engineer." Why not? There is nothing intrinsic that dictates that your kid can be a doctor but not mine. Yes, income, home environment, etc. alter the situation, but at least with public education, the costs of this phase of education is the same for both our kids. I do not say that everyone should be a doctor or an engineer, but there is nothing inherent that will prevent our kids from being one. Look at most of the successful people around us. Yes, they can be successful without college, and there are college-grads who have been unsuccessful, but the stats for a large number are clear: a college-grad *on average* is more successful - better job, better salary, access to more opportunities. We will always need more doctors than plumbers. So for example, if a school can add more biology classes than in plumbing, would it not be better for your kid were he or she be trying to be a doctor? You can unsuccessful at being a doctor and then be a plumber as a fallback. The reverse is almost unheard of. High-schoolers are on the cusp of choosing a rather decisive path for their lives. If you do not put in all you have, it will be that much more difficult later when education is not equally affordable to everyone
Teacher July 03, 2012 at 07:37 PM
Of course there should be more vocational classes/programs. My cousin graduated HS with her degree and a cosmetology license. Her brother, a HS grad and certified auto tech. I took wood shop, auto shop, and drafting. (All outside of California) Not only are these important as kids try to figure out what they are good at, (note: I didn't say what they liked) but these are seminal moments. When else might a kid learn to plane a piece of wood or adjust the timing on an old Nova. I remember back to a time when the liberals wanted Voc.Ed out of the schools. It was argued that having a vocational path was de facto tracking. The white and asian kids went the 4 year pre-college route while the black and hispanic kids ended up in the vocational classes. Then came the push for ALL students to be college grads. Hey, I want ALL students to be college grads too, but along the way, maybe we could remember we are all differently talented and maybe, just maybe, we can begin to do what we've been talking about doing in education for decades. Individualizing the education of the child
cusd mom July 03, 2012 at 09:28 PM
mathteacher, You are right on!
bbq July 03, 2012 at 10:09 PM
Where I grew up, we had a specific vocational (tech) school, which, to this day has been extremely successful in training students that otherwise were not on the "college track." They offer all kinds of degree programs, including culinary training, automobile, hairdressing, etc., where they get real life training in their craft. I also think our kids should be taught "Adult Life 101," - finance, real estate, etc.
fact checker July 03, 2012 at 11:52 PM
The liberals? I recall the push for college for all being more of a parent/legislative push but not of one party over another. What is your source for this?
Capo Parent July 04, 2012 at 02:51 AM
I couldn't have said it better myself.
Capo Parent July 04, 2012 at 02:55 AM
What a novel idea, teach students real world skills, e.g. finance, real estate, basic gov't, etc. Of course, given how CUSD has handled its finances over the last two years, it should outsource teaching financing so that our students actually learn how to properly apply basic financial principles like don't spend more money then you have.
Nom de Plume July 04, 2012 at 07:23 AM
Within a few years, we will realize that the Common Core, which eliminates much of the mumbo jumbo of modern education, and the irrational "teaching to the test" of the "No Student Left Behind" movement, is the best thing that has happened to education in the U.S. in recent memory. The dissenters will be those (like Bill Evers, I expect) who are political ideologists, not realists. Do you know that one of the principal advocates of this concept is the U.S. military, who have difficulty coping with the wildly disparate educational preparation of their recruits, both enlisted and officers? Congratulations to the CUSD Board for taking this important step forward. Now let's make it work - for our students and our society!
Ken Lopez Maddox July 04, 2012 at 03:53 PM
I was having lunch with a couple of CEOs of the U.S. divisions of German owned corporations discussing our educational system. Two takeaways...one of them commented he has jobs for highly skilled technicians but anyone with a degree in the humanities would be a better fit as a barrista at Starbucks. The other noted how our culture looks down on those in the trades. In Germany, becoming a skilled electrician, technician etc...takes as many years as it does to get a college degree and is held in the same esteem.
M July 04, 2012 at 04:07 PM
Right on target. Education has gone to teaching to the middle. unfortunately democracy has not worked for education when mainstreaming became the ideal. Not all children learn the same. I mean this respectfully that putting high and very low children together does not work because teachers can't address the needs of the very high and the very low. Something has to change. Mainstreaming had good intentions but as we've seen in the last 20-40 years or so it's not working.
fact checker July 04, 2012 at 05:16 PM
The problem with tracking, M, is the instruments used to determine the levels. And, of course, the developmental standing of the student. Achievement is rarely a perfect instrument in forecasting ability.
Amy Bentley July 05, 2012 at 04:41 PM
Ken- Very interesting comments. A year or so ago I interviewed the owner of a major auto business in the San Gabriel Valley for another story and he said essentially the same thing. He could not, for the life of him, find anyone locally in So. Cal to hire to work on high-end cars, engines, new auto technology, green auto technology, and he had major contracts from big car makers. He said he has been sending job recruiters to other states to hire technical people that easily start jobs at $20-plus an hour plus benefits. I'm pretty sure that pays more than a barrista... Just sayin'.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something