More than 60 percent of all students entering the California State University system are not ready for college-level English and math, and local students appear to be no different, according to recently released test results.
Called the Early Assessment Program, administered by CSU and the state Department of Education to students in their junior year, the tests determine college-readiness, according to the program’s website.
Of the 40,000 first-time college freshmen that enter into the CSU system each year, 25,000 need to take remedial classes, according to the website.
“These 25,000 freshmen all have taken the required college preparatory curriculum and earned at least a B grade point average in high school,” the website explains.
So how do students in the Capistrano and Saddleback Valley unified school districts measure up?
About the same.
Scoring is broken down into three categories: “ready,” “conditional” and “not ready.”
While math scores were divided into these same three categories in 2011, this is the first year it was done for English scores. Last year for English, the scores were merely “ready” or “not ready,” making it difficult to compare precise apples-to-apples.
Capistrano Unified
Only two schools, Aliso Niguel and Tesoro, have English “ready” scores higher than the freshman class as CSU. In math, no school scored higher than a 30 percent “ready” rate.
A CUSD spokesman did not respond to requests for comment.
Taking all the schools' results and averaging them, this year’s scores have Capistrano Unified students demonstrating pure college readiness in English at 38 percent and in math at 24 percent.
Capo students across the district’s six comprehensive high schools fell into the “not ready” category for English at a rate of 41 percent and at a rate of 26 percent for math.
The rest fall into the “conditional” category. According to the Early Assessment Program, students who score below “ready” but above “not ready,” according to CSU:
... have demonstrated readiness at this point in time for English [or math] at the CSU. However, they will need to take an appropriate English [or math] course in the senior year to ensure that they continue to be ready.
Carolina Cardena, a spokeswoman for CSU, describes the "conditional" designation this way: "At the time the student took the test we felt they were ready for college level work but were close to not being ready, and if they take a year off from taking a rigorous math or English course they would lose the skill in those subject areas."
Juniors who did not pass the English test were placed in an expository reading and writing course this year, according to a memo to the Board of Trustees.
Overall, more Capo seniors across the district are ready for college English than the class that just graduated, 39 percent versus 35 percent. However, they are ready for college math at the same rate of 22 percent for 2012 and 2011.
More students fall into the middle, “conditional” category in math this year than last: 48 percent in 2012 versus 46 percent in 2011.
See the charts below for specific school numbers.
Saddleback Unified
Students from Trabuco Hills are ready for college English at a much greater rate than Saddleback’s three other comprehensive high schools. They clock in with 52 percent of juniors testing ready for college English.
Meanwhile, all the math scores from the four schools have less than a 30 percent ready rate, with Laguna Hills High having the highest at 27 percent.
A SVUSD spokeswoman did not return a reporter’s call.
Calculating the district averages, 38 percent of Saddleback students are college-ready in English, 24 percent in math. While the math rates were the same in 2011, English results dropped from an average of 42 percent in 2011.
Meanwhile, the number of students not ready in math dropped slightly, from 28 percent in 2011 to 26 percent in 2012.
See the charts below for specific school numbers.
Capistrano Unified Early Assessment Results 2012 School% English Ready
% English Conditional
% English Not Ready
% Math Ready
% Math
Conditional
% Math Not Ready
Aliso Niguel 47 20 33 30 47 23 Capo Valley 32 21 47 21 42 37 Dana Hills 32 19 49 22 47 31 San Clemente 37 21 42 14 57 29 San Juan Hills 40 20 41 18 50 32 Tesoro 45 23 32 27 45 28
Saddleback Valley Unified
Early Assessment Results 2012 School% English Ready
% English
Conditional
% English Not Ready
% Math Ready
% Math
Conditional
% Math Not Ready
El Toro 26 21 53 24 52 23 Laguna Hills 35 22 43 27 51 21 Mission Viejo 38 22 40 20 48 32 Trabuco Hills 52 23 25 24 49 27
Wow, you want a yes vote on Prop 30 & 38. So you want the maximum amount of taxes on CA tax payers. Even the teachers union is not taking such an extreme position. Hard to believe anyone could be more extreme and more to the left than the teachers union. Why not just extend an open invitation to all tax paying citizens and businesses to leave CA, because if you don't, CA will tax you into oblivion. It appears your real objective is to redistribute wealth & prosperity in CA all in the name of education, because I can't think of any other logical reason for you wanting both Prop 30 & 38 to pass. I guess the next thing you will propose is a parcel tax and a school bond on top of Prop 30 & 38.
Because it's spectactularly ironic how Californians on both sides of this issue have decided it prudent to spend tens of MILLIONS of dollars on multiple, related ballot initiatives. This is what I mean by one horrible comedy show. Except nobody gets the irony. In other news, several OC school district schools are kicking butt with improved API scores after experiencing layoffs and the proverbial budget shaft for the last several years. Hmmmm.
Yes, if you are educated and have money and have time you can homeschool your children if you choose to. In America we have public schools because we believe in education for all and not just the educated and people with money. We pay for our children's education through taxes. We also pay for other people's taxes. We also "grovel" as you say for safety, for emergency situations, for safe infrastructure, for safe streets. Like education these are not entitlements these are things we pay for as citizens. These are things that give a higher standard of living for all. In America we choose to educate all of our children. You may not agree with this and believe that parents should even though many cannot but this is something that is the law It benefits us all to have an educated community.
Over a 150 years ago. You already pay taxes for education unless you do not pay your taxes. Some people would like to choose whose education they want to pay fo but that is not how we provide education in the U.S.A. We do not discriminate. Yes, many years ago some people chose not to educate women, not too many years ago some chose not to educate African Americans, some chose not to educate Native Americans. The constitution and the American people as a whole did not agree. You may wish to choose whose education you pay for but most of us do not. Most want to educate children, all children. The majority of us in the U.S.A. were educated in government schools. We were handed over to caring teachers in the public schools.
We can't afford NOT to educate the misbehaved and the children of immigrants. What would you have them do? Stay home? Roam the streets? Continue the cycle by raising uneducated children of their own? What exactly do you have in mind for the children whose families can't or won't support their education by participating in or supporting the education of their children? The responsibility of educating our populace belongs to everyone.
You can't cite a specific example because there isn't one. What you see in your business is a sample of students who require help (or whose parents think they do to stay "ahead of the pack"). You do not see those students who matriculated easily into college or who deem to handle it on their own. You also do not see students who choose a path other than college or who take another path (community college or vocational schools). How students do on the SAT or even the college they choose (or do not choose) has little effect on their eventual happiness, financial success, or advancement in their chosen occupation. What matters is their motivation and the importance they place on a number of factors.
We blame government when it fails us, yet we keep electing the same people over and over again, even though they serve those who do not have our best interests in mind. We ignore the huge debt those we hire to teach our children incur to get their education and teaching credentials. Then we expect them to work for near poverty level wages. Can we expect them to get by on a salary of $50,000 per annum? Out of this they are going to pay off their student loans? Out of this they are going to be buying classroom supplies? Out of this they are going to finance a mortgage? Out of this they are going to make co-payments for their health care? Out of this they are going to raise their own family? Why do American students rank 25th in math, 17th in science and 14th in reading? If Finland can provide a free education to every citizen from pre-school through doctorate degree, why can we not do the same? .