.
Feedback

Barcelona, Oxford Parents Square Off

The new charter school wants more space to accommodate students. Parents at Barcelona Hills, which shares its campus with Oxford, say the move threatens their school's very existence.

Parents from a Mission Viejo campus that houses two schools squared off at the Capistrano Unified School District’s school board meeting Monday.

The subject was a request from the campus' charter school, Oxford Preparatory Academy, to expand its maximum student population from 628 to 772. The school board did not take any action, as the report was informational only, but set a public hearing on the matter for its Jan. 9 meeting.

Oxford parents packed the board meeting room dressed in teal, their school color. A few parents also showed up to lobby for their school’s very existence.

“We are watching our neighborhood school become a drive-by school for parents as far away as San Clemente,” said Barcelona dad Patrick Mallon. He called Oxford’s request for growth “continuing and domineering demands for space.”

Meanwhile, “it’s second-class citizen treatment for a first-class school,” Mallon said.

school board trustees , giving the green light for as many as 550 students and the ability to run a 100-student independent-study program.

But Oxford voluntarily reduced its regular enrollment to 450 K-8 students and agreed to .

Under Proposition 39, Capistrano Unified must provide facilities free of charge to charter schools that serve Capo students. Sharing the Barcelona Hills campus was the only solution the district could devise, Superintendent Joseph Farley has said.

“I don’t think Prop. 39 was designed to close an existing school,” said Barcelona parent Magda McClain, who added that the two schools are “not existing harmoniously.”

Barcelona parents attended the board’s last meeting to complain during the open-comments session about several instances of Oxford students bullying Barcelona students.

Oxford dad Rob Johnson countered that a handful of Barcelona parents have tried to intimidate the Oxford administration, and in one instance, sheriff’s deputies were called to the scene.

Interrupting from his seat, Mallon shouted: “That’s a good one. That’s a good one.”

Johnson said that proved his point.

“For every complaint they have made, we could reciprocate. But [Executive Director] Sue Roche has recommended we stay above the fray,” Oxford parent Johnson said. “Every student, whether at Oxford or Barcelona, is a student in this district and deserves your protection.”

Several other Oxford parents spoke in support of the school. Parent Brian McCrary said the “vicious and intense feelings” began before trustees decided on the campus share. Picketing Barcelona parents held up signs that said “Keep Barcelona pure” and “Barcelona is the best, God will take care of the rest.”

Added McClary: “This is a potentially unsafe situation for all if left unresolved.”

Roche did address the board, saying she and Barcelona’s administration are working hard to resolve any issues. School staff is teaching students about school rules and what to do if they feel they are being bullied.

She added that her school’s request for more space is linked to a recent call for parents to indicate whether they would like to enroll their children in Oxford next year. She received about 1,600 intents-to-enroll overall, with 1,491 coming from families who live within Capo Unified’s boundaries.

“We felt it was necessary to provide the opportunity for more students to come to our school,” she said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Juan Capistrano Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Capo Parent December 13, 2011 at 02:54 pm
BH should have been closed several years ago. It has roughly 200 students. Given its demographics, it likely will fall below 200 students next year. Logic, common sense and fiscal prudence dictate that BH should be closed. Unfortunately, it has been a very long time since CUSD has acted with common sense, logic and fiscal prudence.
KC December 13, 2011 at 03:33 pm
Wouldn't you say that part of the problem is the parents? They flip out at the notion that their children would have to take the bus to a different school, or walk there. It doesn't matter what the board does, the parents will always be mad at them.
KC December 13, 2011 at 03:34 pm
It is too bad that the school will probably be gone, but at the same time the reality is that there aren't enough bodies to fill the seats in the present form and someone else has a solution.
Concerned Parent December 13, 2011 at 07:23 pm
I would just like to say it is not the parents, it is the district.
Lisa Middleton January 26, 2012 at 06:25 pm
BH only has 200 students because more than half the school left because they did not want to be on a shared campus.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lawrene Bottorf June 15, 2013 at 03:57 pm
Bummer...
Clint Worthington June 16, 2013 at 03:44 pm
You have a right to live in peace in your home. I would not put up with that.
rob h June 13, 2013 at 07:11 am
Wonder how many people even understood the first COEXIST sticker, let alone this one
Lynn Monaghan June 14, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Paige, I'm confused too. Just imagine how the Statue of Liberty/ Mother of Exiles must feel aboutRead More being on the sticker. Caring for our tired and poor immigrants, our tempest-tossed and huddled masses yearning to breathe free, doesn't seem to be a top priority for capitalists, after all. Maybe she should be replaced with someone else who could look like an "i"... maybe Joe the Plumber with an outstretched arm holding a plunger?
Status Quo June 16, 2013 at 04:57 pm
Easily as laughable as the mixed message of the effrontery of the coexist sticker... the simplestRead More explanation may be the truth.
John Egan June 13, 2013 at 08:31 pm
To Cox Cable: Make sure Trumbo signs where the customer wants him to sign... Just came back fromRead More Pechanga where Mark was signing and he was signing baseballs with sharpies; not signing on the sweet spot, putting ASTERISKS (!?) after his name on jerseys; and signing helmets on the back, behind the ear flap... Don't take expensive items down there...
Clint Worthington June 13, 2013 at 08:50 am
The City approved the plans for Del Taco many years ago. What they did not approve was the changeRead More in the color to the tiles and the change in color to the outside of the building. Those are changes to the original plans submitted by Del Taco. As the Design Review Committee pointed out, these changes are not acceptable. The City does have strict requirements regarding signs and architecture.