.
Feedback

Capo's Graduation Rate for Class of 2010 Is County's 3rd Highest

The local dropout rate is the second lowest in the county. Capo's figures are far better than county, state averages.

Updated at 6:25 p.m. Aug. 11 with statements from CUSD spokesman Marcus Walton.

In 2010, boasted one of the highest graduation rates in Orange County.

It ranked third and also claimed the second-lowest dropout rate, according to the California Department of Education, which on Thursday released the latest figures for the class of 2010.

“Our teachers and administrators deserve a huge round of applause for this result,” said Trustee Anna Bryson.

The state used different methods of calculation this year, so the department cautioned against comparing Thursday’s figures with results from previous years.

The graduation rate in Capistrano Unified for the class of 2010 was 94.6 percent, right behind ’s 95.5 percent and top-achieving Irvine Unified with a graduation rate of 96.8 percent.

Neighboring school districts in South Orange County were not far behind. Saddleback Valley Unified had a 92.5 percent graduation rate, and boasted a graduation rate of 94 percent.

District spokesman Marcus Walton said that the fact that the state's numbers show that nearly 98 percent of Capistrano Unified students had either earned their diplomas, earned a special education certificate or are continuing to work towards high school completion "is a testament to the teachers, students and families that support our schools."

Capistrano far outpaced the average graduation rate in Orange County, which was 81.7 percent overall. Statewide, California saw a graduation rate of 74.4 percent last year.

Capistrano’s dropout rate of 2.4 percent was second-lowest in the county, behind only Irvine, which had a 2 percent dropout rate in 2010. Statewide, that figure was 18.2 percent; countywide, 14 percent.

Despite the good standing, Bryson said, school officials aim to improve the district's rank.

“Is it good enough?" she asked. "No, but I am confident we can and will continue to move the bar higher until we have the lowest dropout rates, not [second] in the county.”

Walton agreed, saying there is always room for improvement. "Which is why this district has chosen to focus on refining the development, design, and delivery of classroom lessons," he said.

Like state and countywide statistics, Capistrano’s numbers indicate an achievement gap—albeit narrower—between Hispanic and white students. The graduation rate among Hispanics locally is 89.4 percent (compared with the 95.8 percent graduation rate among whites), while statewide it is only 67.7 percent. In Orange County, the average graduation rate among Hispanics was slightly better, at 71.1 percent.

When looking strictly at the graduation rates for Hispanics, Capistrano Unified places fifth in the county, behind Los Alamitos (97.5 percent), Irvine (94.8 percent), Brea-Olinda Unified (94.3 percent) and Tustin Unifed (91.5 percent).

Still, Bryson believes Capistrano’s performance among Hispanics is a sign that a move the board of trustees made five years ago to focus on  is working.

“These children will be a majority of the citizens in California's future, and they deserve our best effort,” she said. “The destiny of California will rest in large part on them. They can achieve, and it is imperative that they do.”

Bryson, a ,  said she is disturbed by the statewide statistics. “California's numbers overall are not acceptable, I will be interested to see how the state Department of Education and districts deal with them,” she said. “Wake up, California. There is no time left to move this issue.”

Graduation/dropout rates by high school for class of 2010

97.5 .09 95.7 2.5 Dana Hills High School 95.1 1.8 Junipero Serra High School 81.9 10.7 93.5 1.8 Tesoro High School 97.7 2

* did not have a graduating class in 2010.

Student August 12, 2011 at 09:54 pm
"Still, Bryson believes Capistrano’s performance among Hispanics is a sign that a move the board of trustees made five years ago to focus on English learners is working."
Or the same move the board made 10 years ago! Bryson is so full of herself.
M August 13, 2011 at 08:51 pm
They must be doing something right, good job!!!
Alberto Barrera August 13, 2011 at 09:48 pm
If you look at the publications from the Department of Education, you'll see a 1.4% increase in the amount of CUSD graduates who could not enroll in a UC/CSU (from 47.5% in 08-09 to 48.9% in 09-10)
Kim McCarthy August 14, 2011 at 01:23 pm
CUSD would pass my dog through 4 years of highschool if they could collect Average Daily Attendance for him.
Kim McCarthy August 14, 2011 at 01:49 pm
May 2010 CCS:
"As a long term educator in CUSD, I have many other names, faces and stories such as this student’s that bear witness to our failed immigration policy. Five or six years ago our schools were overwhelmed with an influx of non English speaking students and the District responded with a full range of curriculum, trained faculty and testing to help this population. While language skills have improved, it is obvious now that despite the best efforts and intentions of individual teachers, the school system alone has failed to inspire the motivation necessary to pursue higher education and offers no effective way to enforce attendance. When students return home to overcrowded living conditions, this creates a nearly impossible environment for healthy living with a functioning family and an abysmal situation for any studying. Sadly, without the strong support of the other social institutions pointing our youth in the right direction, the phrase of “sinking to the lowest common denominator” comes to mind. (Continued...)
Kim McCarthy August 14, 2011 at 01:59 pm
(continued)
The most alarming trend is an increase in teen pregnancy. Nearly all will not consider abortion or adoption and it goes without saying that these kids are those who can least afford what it costs to raise a child. The failure of our federal and state government to enforce existing laws, the failure of our city to enforce building standards and codes to limit overcrowding (I guess denial of any problem is equally destructive) and the attitude of the Catholic Church that has all the signs of encouraging out of wedlock pregnancy certainly are major contributors to an out of control problem" ________________________________________________________ Continual rationalizing-denying-excusing by CUSD / OCSD / City of SJC / OC Supervisors/ Religous Doctrines--profiting from the big business of illegal immigration by extorting taxes from citizens to ineffectively throw at a problem they created and feed with low standards and lack of enforcing the law. Sick and wrong to exploit bright talented capable children for money who would have no problem learning English in 90 days and competency in Math if the people in charge weren't more interested in their personal ambitions than these kids.
Julie McGirr August 14, 2011 at 06:09 pm
This is because it is much harder for ANYONE to enroll in UC/CSU schools, not because of any shortcomings in CSUD.
California's public college and university budgets have been cut drastically, which means there are far fewer classes available to students each year. University students can't get the classes they want, so it's not uncommon for them to spend 5 years (or more) trying to get a four-year degree. As a result, fewer new students are accepted to public universities. At the same time, more students than ever are applying to UC/CSU schools, making the competition even stiffer. Even students with a high school GPA of 4.0 and higher are having trouble getting accepted to their first-choice schools. Attending a community college has formerly been seen as a sure-fire way of being accepted to a four-year university as a transfer student, but that's no longer the case because the UC/CSU schools are so impacted. Consequently, even transfer students are no longer sure to be accepted to a UC or CSU at all. In addition to this, it's getting harder and harder for community college students to get the classes they need to transfer, so a good number of them have to stay at community college for longer than two years before transferring. Despite all this, I'm happy to hear that CSUD's graduation numbers are high and the dropout numbers are low. It's certainly a step in the right direction.
Alberto Barrera August 14, 2011 at 07:35 pm
UC/CSU eligible means that the student has completed the A-G requirements.
Capo mom August 15, 2011 at 12:31 am
The University of California is obliged to accept the top 5% of high school students in California. It is no more difficult to get into UC than it has ever been. In fact if you believe the statistics about how CA is faring nationally in terms of educational superiority, it is easier to get into UC now than it has ever been.
If GPA requirements look tough, you ought to ask yourself what that says about about grade inflation in California's public schools..
Julie McGirr August 15, 2011 at 01:56 am
"Being eligible" and "being able to" are two different things. Many eligible students aren't able to attend UC/CSU schools today.
The top 9% of all high school graduates and the top 9% of any given high school graduating class are guaranteed acceptance to a UC school. This doesn't mean it will be a school they want to attend. It's not difficult to get into UC Merced, but it's not impacted the way UCLA or even UCI are. It's far harder for our California students to get into a UC school today than it was 20 years ago. Capo Mom, I agree with your comment about grade inflation. The grading standards are not the same at all high schools, public or private. They're not even the same for teachers teaching the same course at the same school.
Student August 15, 2011 at 02:03 am
Literate in English in 90 days? Where is this happening Kim? Please, tell us how you'd solve this problem.
Kim McCarthy August 15, 2011 at 11:55 am
STUDENT: It happened at Ambuehl Elementary all the time...frequently a new Hispanic student would come to the school-one in particlular I help in my son's 1st grade class 5 years ago. This little boy came after Christmas and was speaking English fluently in 90 days..few times a week he would be pulled out of the class and given some extra help. This young man was bright as heck, as most are...a little sponge ready to learn. Kim
Student August 15, 2011 at 12:03 pm
Yes, in 90 days they can pick up quite a lot of English through the emersion process, but that isn't going to necessarily transfer into fluency in terms of literacy. And as you said in your post above, the conditions at home have a lot to do with the situation. To claim that this is CUSD's failure or to imply that CUSD extinguishes their willingness to learn is just silly.
M August 15, 2011 at 12:22 pm
One student in 3rd grade "speaking fluently" in 90 days does not say or mean that ALL other students can do the same. Their backgrounds are different, different fluency levels as well as "speaking fluently" may mean this students social language skills improved but can they do well on a speaking and writing test. 90 days fluency is utterly ridiculous.
Pam Sunderman August 15, 2011 at 02:25 pm
So we are to surmise that Kim is qualified to measure the fluency of a student based on her volunteer time in the classroom?
Penny Arévalo August 15, 2011 at 02:59 pm
As the mother of an English learner, I think I do have some insight. One might think that my English learner has the optimal environment, living in a house with two college graduates as parents and college-bound siblings. I can tell you in NO WAY would a non-English speaker become literate in 90 days. Maybe functionally communicative, but not literate. There's a big difference. Of course, a third-grader has a lot of time to catch up to speed.
Shripathi Kamath August 15, 2011 at 03:08 pm
Yes, and I suggest you drop that tone of sarcasm from your comment, young lady!
OK, so the mangled metaphor would have worked better had she instead said "a little sponge ready to **absorb**". Big deal, it was still fluent. I am therefore fully convinced that pulling a kid out of a class and giving him some extra help is the only missing ingredient in achieving fluency. So with only tepid hesitation I offer the following, and ask you to join me: KIM MCCARTHY CAPISTRANO USD TRUSTEE 2012 "No to unions. No to canines with perfect attendance. Yes to sponges and fluency"
Shripathi Kamath August 15, 2011 at 03:11 pm
Oh yeah! As if the wrecker-in-chief of the California finances has any credibility just because she is well-versed in English. That acute accent in your last name is not fooling anyone.
Penny Arévalo August 15, 2011 at 03:15 pm
First of all, the accent is like a big Easter bonnet. I like it! (even if no one here knows how to USE it). Second, the accent comes from my husband's name, who was also a non-English-speaking immigrant to this country at the age of 15. So again, with more experience about what it takes to become fluent in this country. And 90 days is a pipe dream.
Pam Sunderman August 15, 2011 at 03:20 pm
90 days is about as accurate as the rest of Kim's posts. And I am enjoying my sarcasm today and have no intention of abandoning it at the moment. It is a release of sorts...although it accomplishes little I admit...and tends to arouse ire in the wrong people.
Shripathi Kamath August 15, 2011 at 03:27 pm
Of course, this means WAR ladies.
Read 'em and weep: http://www.learnthatlanguagenow.com/articles/language-learning/learn-fluent-italian-in-under-3-months-2 English is easier than Italian. Anyone who disagrees is a fascist like Il Duce. And I will also note--pardon my English here--that Benito didn't need no pretentious diacritic marks. If Kim says it is 90 days to Fluency Nirvana, 90 days it is!
Capo mom August 15, 2011 at 06:00 pm
Children, particularly young children, can acquire social fluency in a second language rapidly, as Kim McCarthy suggests. But that isn't all that is necessary to be successful in high school academic subjects. Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills (BICS) can be rapidly mastered before puberty. In very young children (less than 10 years old) social fluency is often seen in less than 1 year.
Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP) , or the context-reduced language of academics, the language ability high school students need to be academically successful, will usually take five to seven years under ideal conditions to develop to a level commensurate with that of native speakers. Students who do not have Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency take 18 months to learn what comparable native speaking students learn in 10 months. Obviously, students who become socially proficient at an early age have an advantage in terms of developing academic proficiency. For this reason, Spanish language immersion programs may be attractive to families of native English speakers. But they will do little to help native Spanish speakers learn English. In CUSD only 4,789 K-12 students took the CELDT districtwide. That seems pretty low. One has to wonder what is really being done to help non-native English language students (who make up the majority of CUSD students) achieve Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency.
Pam Sunderman August 15, 2011 at 09:49 pm
A lot of cognitive learning takes place in the elementary years as well and it forms the scaffold on which is built the academics of middle and high school. The five to seven years also applies to younger students. Reading fluency in the first language is crucial to developing reading fluency in a second language, which is why full immersion programs such as that available at Las Palmas have been so successful. Learning is carefully constructed based on what research has shown works well. This is entirely different from merely immersing a child in English only instruction and expecting them to become fluent as a result. They learn how to survive but do not develop the language skills to truly understand cognitive concepts.
Penny Arévalo August 15, 2011 at 09:56 pm
I agree with both Capo Mom and jollygirl (hey, did you notice you're mostly agreeing!). There's a huge difference between socializing in English with new friends and writing a research paper. My son wants to be a lawyer. With only one year in this country, I can tell you he has a LONG way to go.
Pam Sunderman August 15, 2011 at 11:05 pm
I know Penny...pretty surprising huh? As for your son...speaking legalese is an entirely different undertaking :). I wish him the very best with that !!!! My sister speaks it and isn't always so happy that she does :).
Alberto Barrera August 15, 2011 at 11:44 pm
I learned English by watching PBS, but I'm pretty sure that it wasn't in 90 days. Probably 91.5 days.
Student August 16, 2011 at 01:46 am
Alberto, were you the kid that Kim McCarthy worked with to help you become fluent in 91.5 days?
Capo mom August 16, 2011 at 01:19 pm
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) results don't bear out your claims about Las Palmas. Their scores are no better than districtwide scores. In some categories Las Palmas' score are actually not as good as districtwide averages.
Comparing Las Palmas with Ambuehl Elementary, the other school mentioned by Kim McCarthy, shows the following results this past year. 3% of Ambuehl's students show advanced performance on the CELDT, 34% show early advanced, 47% show intermediate results, 7% show early intermediate and 9% show beginning. At Las Palmas 5% of students show advanced performance on the CELDT, 22% show early advanced, 40% show intermediate results, 20% show early intermediate and 13% show beginning results. Ambuehl seems to be at least on par with Las Palmas. Ambuehl's raw reading scores are actually (marginally) better. It should be remembered that the CELDT is only given to ELL students and results are based on small samples sizes so they should be interpreted carefully.
Capo mom August 16, 2011 at 01:23 pm
It's interesting to see how students fare as they move on to middle school. At Marco Forster, the school that children from Ambuehl (and many other schools including Kinoshita attend), 14% of students show advanced performance on the CELDT, 38% show early advanced, 37% show intermediate results, 7% show early intermediate and 4% show beginning.
At Bernice Ayer where students from Las Palmas go, 14% of students show advanced performance, 45% show early advanced, 32% show intermediate results, 4% show early intermediate and 4% show beginning. There doesn't seem to be any clear advantage to Las Palmas bilingual immersion program according to the CELDT.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Juan Capistrano Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lawrene Bottorf June 15, 2013 at 03:57 pm
Bummer...
Clint Worthington June 16, 2013 at 03:44 pm
You have a right to live in peace in your home. I would not put up with that.
rob h June 13, 2013 at 07:11 am
Wonder how many people even understood the first COEXIST sticker, let alone this one
Lynn Monaghan June 14, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Paige, I'm confused too. Just imagine how the Statue of Liberty/ Mother of Exiles must feel aboutRead More being on the sticker. Caring for our tired and poor immigrants, our tempest-tossed and huddled masses yearning to breathe free, doesn't seem to be a top priority for capitalists, after all. Maybe she should be replaced with someone else who could look like an "i"... maybe Joe the Plumber with an outstretched arm holding a plunger?
Status Quo June 16, 2013 at 04:57 pm
Easily as laughable as the mixed message of the effrontery of the coexist sticker... the simplestRead More explanation may be the truth.
John Egan June 13, 2013 at 08:31 pm
To Cox Cable: Make sure Trumbo signs where the customer wants him to sign... Just came back fromRead More Pechanga where Mark was signing and he was signing baseballs with sharpies; not signing on the sweet spot, putting ASTERISKS (!?) after his name on jerseys; and signing helmets on the back, behind the ear flap... Don't take expensive items down there...
Clint Worthington June 13, 2013 at 08:50 am
The City approved the plans for Del Taco many years ago. What they did not approve was the changeRead More in the color to the tiles and the change in color to the outside of the building. Those are changes to the original plans submitted by Del Taco. As the Design Review Committee pointed out, these changes are not acceptable. The City does have strict requirements regarding signs and architecture.